Opinion: We are smarter this time around.
Nov. 23, 2011
The release of stolen e-mail correspondence from climate scientists won't have the same impact it had the first time around, in 2009. The science is robust.
By John Abraham
for the Daily Climate
When news broke earlier this week that another cache of e-mails had been released purporting to show that climate scientists had "cooked the books," parties around the world looked carefully, this time with a doubtful eye. They had a right to doubt. Two years ago, almost to the day, similar e-mails had been released just before the United Nations' climate change conference in Copenhagen – the last best hope to take meaningful action to halt the warming climate.
The original 2009 release caught the world by storm and created an uproar that successfully put climate science on the defensive for nearly two years. Whoever is behind the release of these stolen e-mails was clearly hoping the same play would work again.
A few things are different this time around. Most importantly, many journalists now realize they were played the fools. They were told that these e-mails showed scientists "hiding declines in temperature" and conspiring against others. These same media outlets had a lot of work cleaning egg off their face when it became clear that the correspondence said nothing of the sort. In a "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me" manner, the media is largely ignoring these new e-mails, or they are reporting the real story: The e-mails are taken out of context, the science is robust and has been upheld by every investigation of the 2009 release, and that climate change is already underway.
$9 billion drought
That last point is the real story behind this new email leak: The science is so solid, the denier camp can no longer argue an alternate theory. In past years, that camp would promote their own "scientists" whose work, they said, called into question climate change. In the past few years, the evidence of climate change has become so apparent that denial is no longer valid. As Texas sits through a $9 billion drought and other parts of the United States suffer from either record droughts or flooding, even skeptical citizens are starting to realize that climate change is real, and it affects them and their pocketbook.
In addition, the dwindling number of "scientists" that have represented the denialist camp have seen their research crumble like a deck of cards. These scientists have no one to blame. They are one-man wrecking crews of their own reputations. They have regularly published work that reportedly shows climate change either isn't happening or is inconsequential. And just as regularly, their work is shown to be seriously flawed and is roundly rebutted and criticized.
So the denialists are left with little but impugning the reputations of climate scientists. They need an accomplice, and last time an unwitting mainstream media lent a hand. This time around, the accomplice has learned its lesson and has wised up. This time, trumped-up charges against scientists will not stick.
Not only is this good news for scientists, it is good news for the rest of us. Maybe now the conversation can shift to how to handle this dilemma in a way that not only fixes the environmental problem, but also increases job growth and improves national security. Maybe now we can finally come together and work on solutions to turn this obstacle into an opportunity. Let's have faith and confidence in ourselves and in our scientists and engineers to solve this problem. That faith and confidence is true patriotism. Personal and unfounded attacks against climate scientists?
That's so 2009.
John Abraham is an associate professor of Thermal Sciences at the University of St. Thomas in Minneapolis, Minn. He teaches and carries out research in the areas of thermodynamics, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, and climate monitoring. He is co-founder of the Climate Rapid Response Team.
DailyClimate.org is a nonprofit news service that covers climate change. Opinions expressed are the views of the author and not DailyClimate.org
Find more Daily Climate stories in the
This work by is licensed under a .
Based on a work at
Recent DailyClimate.org coverage
21 NovemberNaomi Oreskes found herself under attack in 2004, when she called attention to the scientific consensus on climate change. Her search for those behind the broadside led her to document the evolution of doubt-mongering.
18 NovemberThe oceans have absorbed 93 percent of the heat generated by our emissions over the past 50 years. And it's the Pacific Ocean that's driving Texas' punishing drought right now - and that could bring a bounty of snow to Rocky Mountain skiers this winter, forecasters with the Climate Prediction Center said Thursday.
18 NovemberToday's IPCC summary on extreme weather makes clear that no one will escape the changes being driven by our greenhouse gas emissions. Change is happening now. Will we act in time?
7 NovemberDavid Mossop and Sherpas Cinemas are transforming ski flicks, turning the usual plot-less, context-less jumble of skiing images into a message about environmental destruction, mass consumption and climate change. A Climate Query.
3 NovemberWe need vocal and public leadership on the science of climate change. We cannot sit idly by as research and science are discarded or ignored. If university leaders don't stand up, who will?
2 NovemberThis year's rash of severe weather is changing climate science. As policymakers call for better information, scientists are scrambling to understand the link between increasing emissions and natural disasters. As they do so, researchers are shifting from hypothetical scenarios to short-term forecasts.
26 OctoberThe Yukon River is delivering upwards of five tons of mercury a year to the Arctic environment, likely in response to a warming climate, scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey announced Tuesday. Thawing permafrost and industrial pollution are fingered as culprits.
24 OctoberA constellation of satellites offers unsurpassed insight on our changing planet, allowing scientists - and the public - to draw conclusions and connect seemingly disparate trends. But the fleet is aging.
18 OctoberFar from being "alarmist," predictions from climate scientists in many cases are proving to be more conservative than observed climate-induced impacts, researchers say.
12 OctoberA desire to connect the dots led oceanographer Synte Peacock to the isolated, alpine wolverine. In a pioneering study, she found changes to the spring snowpack endangered their survival in the western U.S. - and means problems for all of us. A Climate Query