Renewables: The 99.9 percent solution
A view of wind turbines from the Hrad, in Slovakia. Photo by Ricz Ribeiro/flickr.
Jan. 20, 2013
Renewable energy? Too unreliable, too expensive, many people think. But a new study has found that the right mix of renewables can tick all the boxes.
By Tim Radford
Climate News Network
LONDON – A combination of wind and solar power and sophisticated energy storage systems could keep a power grid fully supplied between 90 and 99.9 percent of the time, at costs comparable with today's fossil fuel and nuclear mix, according to a new study from Delaware in the United States.
Computer simulation measured the performance of inland and offshore wind farms and photovoltaic cells, backed up by battery and fuel cell storage, under the lowest cost conditions, for a 72 gigawatt grid system (one gigawatt will typically provide power for about 750,000 to a million US households)..
Researchers from the University of Delaware and Delaware Technical Community College will report in the Journal of Power Sources for March 2013 that they tested 28 billion combinations of renewable energy systems and storage, under four years of real load and weather data from a working commercial system.
"These results break the conventional wisdom that renewable energy is too unreliable and expensive," said Willett Kempton of the University of Delaware, one of the team. "The key is to get the right combination of electricity sources and storage – which we did by an exhaustive search – and to calculate costs correctly."
Power demand and supply is an engineering headache: demand fluctuates according to hour, day of the week, the weather and the season, while wind power is vulnerable to calm weather and solar power is not supplied at night.
Huge storage costs
Storage costs are huge, and increase with the need to store for each extra hour. So right now, most electrical generators burn more fossil fuel to meet extra demand.
"The common view is that a high fraction of renewable power generation would be costly and would either often leave us in the dark or require massive electrical storage," say the researchers.
But they found quite a different result. They tweaked their computer model and varied the conditions where they could: they found that consistent wind power could be obtained if the turbine fields were dispersed at distances greater than 1,000 kilometers.
They exploited not just hydrogen fuel cells and batteries for storage, but also grid-integrated vehicles: electric cars and trucks which when not being driven also served as sources for the grid.
They calculated the cost of renewable electricity generation without subsidies from either state or federal government, and when they made comparisons with fossil power, they factored in the external health and other costs of fossil fuel pollution.
The researchers worked with the prices for 2008, and with the projected costs of power for 2030, and they did not allow for any future advances in renewable technology.
They found that the cheapest solution was to generate far more power than consumers could demand. If they generated 180 percent of the necessary load, renewable sources could supply all that the grid needed for 90 percent of the time. If they generated 290 percent, then they could rely on renewable resources 99.9 percent of the time: that is, for all but nine hours a year.
And renewable energy, on this model, is the least-cost option, or close to it. "At expected 2030 technology costs, the cost-minimum is 90 percent of hours met entirely by renewable," the team report. "And 99.9 percent of hours, while not the cost-minimum, is lower in cost than today's total cost of electricity."
is a journalism news service started by four veteran British environmental reporters and broadcasters. It delivers news and commentary about climate change for free to media outlets worldwide.
The Daily Climate is an independent, foundation-funded news service covering climate change. Contact editor Douglas Fischer at dfischer [at] dailyclimate.org
Find more Daily Climate stories in the
Recent DailyClimate.org coverage